$FTAI is designed to settle platform fees, stake against service tiers and govern published risk parameters. Most of that is designed rather than live, and this page separates the two — because a token page that blurs them is the single clearest signal that a project is not worth your time.
Fixed total supply. No mint function.
Presale allocation
Products that require holding $FTAI to work
No contract address exists yet
If a claim is not in the first column, do not price it as if it were. We will move items across as they ship, and the changelog will say when.
The defensible version of the argument is narrow. FIN-TECHAI sells API calls to regulated businesses, and those businesses pay in fiat or stablecoins. A token is not needed to make that work, and we are not going to pretend it is.
Where it does earn its place is parameter governance. Scoring weights and thresholds are the most contested part of a risk system: they determine whose alerts fire and whose transactions are withheld. Today we set them and publish the methodology. A token that lets the firms actually bearing that cost vote on published parameters — with their stake proportional to the volume they run — is a genuinely better arrangement than a vendor deciding alone.
The second is alignment on burn. If platform revenue burns supply, holders are exposed to real usage of a real product rather than to a narrative. That only means anything because the revenue exists first.
| Item | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Total supply | 1,000,000,000 $FTAI | Fixed. No mint function; supply can only decrease by burn. |
| Presale allocation | 100,000,000 (10%) | Vesting: 25% at launch, then three equal quarterly tranches. |
| Contract address | Not deployed | Published here at deployment. Any address circulated before then is fraudulent. |
| Fee settlement | Designed | Not live. No product requires the token. |
| Burn | Designed | Revenue-linked, published rate, on-chain evidence when it starts. |
| Governance scope | Risk parameters | Deliberately narrow at launch. Expanding it is itself a governance decision. |
The whitepaper is authoritative on allocation across all categories. Where this page and the whitepaper appear to differ, the whitepaper governs.
The token is downstream of whether the four modules are worth paying for. Start there — run your own data through them and see.